22 Nov
2014
22 Nov
'14
2:16 p.m.
On 22.11.2014, at 14:12, Bert Freudenberg bert@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 21.11.2014, at 23:01, Eliot Miranda uploaded VMMaker.oscog-eem.950.mcz
Introduce >>> as an explicitly signed shift.
Ugh, can we pick something else, please? It's really confusing. In various languages (notably Java and JavaScript), >> is signed and >>> unsigned. I don't know any language that has both operators and the meaning reversed.
And >> still means signed or unsigned depending on context. Not nice at all.
How about ...
signed/unsigned depending on type (what we have now)
- force unsigned shift
- force signed shift
This is nice! Best -Tobias