On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:45 AM, David T. Lewis lewis@mail.msen.com wrote:
In this case I wonder if it might make more sense to move the plugin into the VMMaker repository. The SqueakSSLPlugin is complete and it seems unlikely to need any active development aside from minor updates such as the one Eliot is posting here.
Normally I would discourage moving plugins into VMMaker if they are part of any active project, but this seems like a case it which in which a separate repository is not needed, and it may be easier for everyone to give it a home along with the other stable plugins.
Eliot, is that OK with you?
Yes, that's fine with me.
Sorry for top posting, I'm stuck on an ancient web browser for the moment.
lot's more contexts where top-posting seems acceptable to me these days; e.g. phones.
Dave
On 10 January 2014 04:40, Ron Teitelbaum ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Frank Shearar Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 5:54 PM
On 9 January 2014 22:26, Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
who has write rights to http://www.squeaksource.com/SqueakSSL?
I
don't :-(. Here's a pragmatized version of the plugin. Can someone either put it in place and/or give me write permission?
I suspect Ron Teitelbaum holds the keys.
Actually I don't have write access to that repo. It's just Andreas. We could create a new repo or maybe have someone add Eliot (or me) to the squeaksource SqueakSSL repo?
Oh, OK. Or we could ask an admin to do that. David, you have admin rights, don't you?
frank
Ron Teitelbaum