In message 42AE647F.1000808@gmx.de Andreas Raab andreas.raab@gmx.de wrote:
I agree strongly. I even have your old code for this sitting around. The
issue
is that a plugin expecting the vm to supply session id would have to run
with a
vm able to so do. It seems some people mix releases and might get upset by this. Personally I say to hell with them. Others might disagree.
Backwards compatibility is important but I think we can dodge this one easily.
Good point. We're already opening a new VM_PROXY_MINOR level for fetchLong32ofObject so adding the sessionID doobry will be no problem. At last, an excuse to add this small but pleasing cleanup!
tim -- Tim Rowledge, tim@rowledge.org, http://www.rowledge.org/tim Strange OpCodes: MBR: Move Bits Randomly