Thanks Geoffroy. I hope that your energy will be used by VM maintainers.
Stef
Hello,
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Igor Stasenko siguctua@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 May 2010 18:21, David T. Lewis lewis@mail.msen.com wrote:
Geoffroy,
I have not tried your CMake build yet (sorry), but building a range of Windows and Unix VMs on a single build host sounds like a very useful thing. Well done! I'm curious what others think of the idea.
I think its a good idea of having a least common denominator for building VMs.
Then, I'll continue to fix my CMake scripts :)
Can I send my patches for the rest of the sources right now? I'm not using the same compiler version for the win32 VM (I have gcc 4.2.1 here), and it doesn't build out of the box. On the bright side, I think I can remove a lot of code from the VM, because MinGW fixed a lot of their headers since gcc 3.4.
Also, now DirectDraw and DirectInput headers and import lib (from DirectX 8) are provided by MinGW. Any good reason to keep the Squeak Win32 tools package, now that it's obsolete?
What are the supported Windows versions? I could clean up some code if I remove parts specific to win95 and win2000.
Best regards,
Geoffroy