Yoshiki Ohshima wrote:
At Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:20:35 -0300, Juan Vuletich wrote:
The Viewpoints agreement covers the past contribution made under the Squeak License, but a clear statement like this (and perhaps a clearer one on your website) would be good.
-- Yoshiki
Why "would be good" and not "is good"? What is missing?
The Cuis image (the most significant code I published since I signed the agreement) is under the MIT license (thanks to you Yoshiki!). It includes a workspace with a clear statement.
Sorry for writing an obscure message. What I meant was more about a blurb on your website.
I will include a general statement in my site covering any code found there.
Is there anything else you believe I should do?
That should be enough. I downloaded a version played with it but now cannot tell a license file was in the .zip file or not. It is good to have it in there, too.
-- Yoshiki
Thanks for the clarification. BTW, I did not include a license file in Cuis (but I could do it!). I included a workspace with a statement inside the image. Is that ok?
Cheers, Juan Vuletich