On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 08:11 Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marcel,
On Jan 25, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Marcel Taeumel marcel.taeumel@hpi.de wrote:
The ReleaseBuilder does not deal with the build number. We do need that offset in Squeak-Version to compute our build number.
Then I suggest it contain a class called SqueakVersion whose class comment includes the gist of Levente's message and whose two method categories, class & instance side, are called 'read the class comment' ;-)
+++++++ 1
i think this comment idea is a good idea and i will use it in future if i ever get to because people not in the know would know then but who cares about them but how long would it take to put this Class in but if there was no head scratching or head banging would not people feel that something is missing ? and say TRA-DI-TION and the weight of all the previous nothing pray tell : no-leave the head scratching and banging in or i didn’t know you were going to chide me now i definitely will not do anything you said
but i definitely will do this if i ever get to
because people not in the know will probably be me in another day or two
according to me and that guy who made erLang who made some forlorn plea for just such a mercy on a future he who is destined to head banging by today me who doesn’t see any need to avoid it as he notes that other genius who made that one single comment in all his years of lines of stuff and it was “and now for the tricky part”
which leads me to i can’t make head or tail of this
TIME TO REWRITE THIS THE WHOLE THING the Whole thing has gone
un maintainable
in my day we rewrote the whole thing once a day
and you can’t just say well here you fix this
because you forgot that future me is not in the know
and un maintainable here we come when future me gets ahold of this one
maybe I’m just forgetful and it’s just me
i do not have a forum on my own stuff to remind me at least not one i have access to please please me the kgb or one that is more than half a bit no no no no no no no no no
no wait there were yes-es in the before time nothing but yes-es now there is only no and everything is spitted and shut down to go time to scrape down to hell down to the chinese bedrock of swiss cheese that tells just keep on scraping a gaping get a cheese cutter
rewrite the whole f thing because the whole f thing has gone to the kells and is spinning in infinity due tell coq
did you know that in SE Asia the bank robbers are in the banks and so nobody has a bank account and so nobody has a Visa card and so google is quitting man going to grab their crotch huh imagine that
;-)
Best, Marcel
Am 25.01.2018 15:57:31 schrieb Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com: Hi Chris,
but Squeak-Version is itself empty and the version info inReleaseBuilder would appear to have obsoleted it. Shouldn't we also remove Squeak-Version?
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
On Jan 24, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Chris Cunningham cunningham.cb@gmail.com wrote:
This one
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Levente Uzonyi leves@elte.hu Date: Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:50 AM Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Removing of Universe classes To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list < squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org>
This question comes up from time to time. There's an empty package named Squeak-Version in the image. When you unload a package, let's say Universes-mt.48, you add 49 (48 + 1) to the version number of Squeak-Version and save it as well to ensure that the global Squeak version number keeps increasing.
Levente