Andres,
Why not to use #& and #| for and & or operations?
Your source code:
^self class new: value + (self negated and: aProbablity negated) value
Can be compiled successfully in other Smalltalk environments
(like Smalltalk Express and Visual Smalltalk).
I think that Squeak parser must not try to optimize #and:
if the argument is not a block node.
Ale.
----------
Desde: sqrmax@cvtci.com.ar[SMTP:sqrmax@cvtci.com.ar]
Enviado el: Sábado 27 de Junio de 1998 16:51
Para: squeak(a)cs.uiuc.edu
Asunto: Re: Re: Two questions
Hi.
>>^self class new: value + (self negated and: aProbability negated) value
>I assume that the class this method is in implements an "and:" message,
>which is what you are trying to use in the code above.
Yes.
>If this is the case, then you will have to choose a different names for
>your operations than "and:" and "or:".
Oh, boy... probabilities look so ugly without them... anyway, I chose
andWith:, orWith: and so. Do you know of any nicer selectors?
Andres.
