Squeak-dev February 2014

squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org

71 participants
188 discussions

call for items for the Annual Squeak Shoutout at FOSDEM
by Craig Latta 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Hoi all-- I'll be doing the Annual Squeak Shoutout again at FOSDEM in Bruxelles this weekend. Please let me know of any Squeak-related accomplishments you'd like me to mention! So far I'll be showing off Squeak 4.5 rc 1, shouting out mad props to Chris. thanks again, -C -- Craig Latta www.netjam.org/resume + 1 510 984 8117 +31 20 893 2796

6 9

Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-ul.564.mcz
by Frank Shearar 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

On 3 February 2014 13:48, <commits(a)source.squeak.org> wrote: > A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox: > http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-ul.564.mcz > > ==================== Summary ==================== > > Name: Collections-ul.564 > Author: ul > Time: 3 February 2014, 2:35:36.802 pm > UUID: 4b9a37ef-df86-40a0-a0dd-8e8b2c04d4ed > Ancestors: Collections-ul.563 > > Make sure that Array >> #isLiteral won't get into an infinite recursion, even if the receiver has an recursive structure. > > =============== Diff against Collections-ul.563 =============== > > Item was changed: > ----- Method: Array>>isLiteral (in category 'testing') ----- > isLiteral > + > + ^self class == Array and: [ > + self isLiteralIfContainedBy: IdentitySet new ]! > - ^self class == Array and: [self allSatisfy: [:each | each isLiteral]]! > > Item was added: > + ----- Method: Array>>isLiteralIfContainedBy: (in category 'testing') ----- > + isLiteralIfContainedBy: parents > + " Answer whether the receiver has a literal text form recognized by the compiler. Precondition: the receiver is an instance of Array. " > + > + (parents includes: self) ifTrue: [ ^false ]. > + parents add: self. > + 1 to: self size do: [ :index | > + | element | > + element := self at: index. > + (element class == Array > + ifTrue: [ element isLiteralIfContainedBy: parents ] > + ifFalse: [ element isLiteral ]) ifFalse: [ ^false ] ]. > + parents remove: self. > + ^true! So this is a basic depth first traversal with cycle protection, yes? (This pattern seems to crop up _a lot_. Maybe it's worth pulling out as a separate algorithm?) frank

2 7

The Trunk: Collections-ul.564.mcz
by commits＠source.squeak.org 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Chris Muller uploaded a new version of Collections to project The Trunk: http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Collections-ul.564.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: Collections-ul.564 Author: ul Time: 3 February 2014, 2:35:36.802 pm UUID: 4b9a37ef-df86-40a0-a0dd-8e8b2c04d4ed Ancestors: Collections-ul.563 Make sure that Array >> #isLiteral won't get into an infinite recursion, even if the receiver has an recursive structure. =============== Diff against Collections-ul.563 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: Array>>isLiteral (in category 'testing') ----- isLiteral + + ^self class == Array and: [ + self isLiteralIfContainedBy: IdentitySet new ]! - ^self class == Array and: [self allSatisfy: [:each | each isLiteral]]! Item was added: + ----- Method: Array>>isLiteralIfContainedBy: (in category 'testing') ----- + isLiteralIfContainedBy: parents + " Answer whether the receiver has a literal text form recognized by the compiler. Precondition: the receiver is an instance of Array. " + + (parents includes: self) ifTrue: [ ^false ]. + parents add: self. + 1 to: self size do: [ :index | + | element | + element := self at: index. + (element class == Array + ifTrue: [ element isLiteralIfContainedBy: parents ] + ifFalse: [ element isLiteral ]) ifFalse: [ ^false ] ]. + parents remove: self. + ^true!

1 0

The Inbox: Collections-ul.564.mcz
by commits＠source.squeak.org 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-ul.564.mcz ==================== Summary ==================== Name: Collections-ul.564 Author: ul Time: 3 February 2014, 2:35:36.802 pm UUID: 4b9a37ef-df86-40a0-a0dd-8e8b2c04d4ed Ancestors: Collections-ul.563 Make sure that Array >> #isLiteral won't get into an infinite recursion, even if the receiver has an recursive structure. =============== Diff against Collections-ul.563 =============== Item was changed: ----- Method: Array>>isLiteral (in category 'testing') ----- isLiteral + + ^self class == Array and: [ + self isLiteralIfContainedBy: IdentitySet new ]! - ^self class == Array and: [self allSatisfy: [:each | each isLiteral]]! Item was added: + ----- Method: Array>>isLiteralIfContainedBy: (in category 'testing') ----- + isLiteralIfContainedBy: parents + " Answer whether the receiver has a literal text form recognized by the compiler. Precondition: the receiver is an instance of Array. " + + (parents includes: self) ifTrue: [ ^false ]. + parents add: self. + 1 to: self size do: [ :index | + | element | + element := self at: index. + (element class == Array + ifTrue: [ element isLiteralIfContainedBy: parents ] + ifFalse: [ element isLiteral ]) ifFalse: [ ^false ] ]. + parents remove: self. + ^true!

1 0

Elections in 10 days
by Ron Teitelbaum 03 Feb '14

03 Feb '14

Hi All, Only 10 days left to announce your candidacy for the Squeak Oversight board. We do not currently have enough candidates. Please consider running for the board! All the best, Ron Teitelbaum

5 8

Timing out Trait tests
by Frank Shearar 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

A bunch of the Trait tests fail, despite no one having worked on the Traits code in quite a while. The symptom is that the tests time out [1]. I've tried to debug some, only to find that they pass. For instance, <timeout: 60> sometimes "fixes" the tests. But the tests shouldn't be failing. Any takers? frank [1] http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/756/testReport/TraitsTests.Kernel/T…

6 16

Some feedback for new splitters
by Mateusz Grotek 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

Hi, Here is some feedback concerning the new splitters functionality. *It's great!* But there should be a minimal width. I managed to almost completely hide the protocol panel. It should not hide anything! Best wishes, Mateusz

1 0

A question concerning Comic Sans
by Mateusz Grotek 01 Feb '14

01 Feb '14

Hi, There is the Comic Sans MS font included in the current release candidate (13668). Is it legal? Best wishes, Mateusz Grotek

2 1

Jump to page: