Plugged LePotato in place of RasPi. Possibly of interest:
both success machines had gcc 6.3.0
failures had gcc 7.3.0 and 8.2.1
Perhaps a code generation change?
-KenD
Hi Ken,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:48 PM ken.dickey@whidbey.com wrote:
Plugged LePotato in place of RasPi. Possibly of interest:
both success machines had gcc 6.3.0
failures had gcc 7.3.0 and 8.2.1
Perhaps a code generation change?
So compile the test functions to assembler with the two different co pilers and do a diff. Or compile dummy functions containing calls to the failing tests and do a diff.
I'm sorry; I don't have a 64-bit ARM machine set up yet. As soon as I do i'll pitch in.
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot
You can also try clang if there is one available...
Le mar. 12 févr. 2019 à 23:55, Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi Ken,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:48 PM ken.dickey@whidbey.com wrote:
Plugged LePotato in place of RasPi. Possibly of interest:
both success machines had gcc 6.3.0
failures had gcc 7.3.0 and 8.2.1
Perhaps a code generation change?
So compile the test functions to assembler with the two different co pilers and do a diff. Or compile dummy functions containing calls to the failing tests and do a diff.
I'm sorry; I don't have a 64-bit ARM machine set up yet. As soon as I do i'll pitch in.
_,,,^..^,,,_ best, Eliot
vm-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org