Andreas wrote:

I am not interesting in arguing.

+1

Things seem to have improved significantly from when I last looked at it, which is good news.

Yes. I will try to keep this separate metacello config for vmmaker maintained, but as I said I need a minimal support from vm-maintainers side to get notified when load order or packages change. Thanks in advance!

David wrote:

I'm also happy to see the Metacello support, because it will make VMMaker more accessible from images that do use Metacello.

Thank you. Yes that was the goal. If a project is easy accessible more people are able to use it or learn or help.

Thanks Torsten