Hi Marcel,
On Jan 25, 2018, at 7:42 AM, Marcel Taeumel marcel.taeumel@hpi.de wrote:
The ReleaseBuilder does not deal with the build number. We do need that offset in Squeak-Version to compute our build number.
Then I suggest it contain a class called SqueakVersion whose class comment includes the gist of Levente's message and whose two method categories, class & instance side, are called 'read the class comment' ;-)
Best, Marcel
Am 25.01.2018 15:57:31 schrieb Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com:
Hi Chris,
but Squeak-Version is itself empty and the version info in ReleaseBuilder would appear to have obsoleted it. Shouldn't we also remove Squeak-Version?
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
On Jan 24, 2018, at 12:58 PM, Chris Cunningham cunningham.cb@gmail.com wrote:
This one
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Levente Uzonyi leves@elte.hu Date: Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:50 AM Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Removing of Universe classes To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
This question comes up from time to time. There's an empty package named Squeak-Version in the image. When you unload a package, let's say Universes-mt.48, you add 49 (48 + 1) to the version number of Squeak-Version and save it as well to ensure that the global Squeak version number keeps increasing.
Levente