23 May
2004
23 May
'04
2:55 a.m.
On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 03:26:14PM -0700, Tim Rowledge wrote:
Don't suppose you've spotted why Exception>outer is broken, seeing that you're on a roll?
I don't even know what Exception>>outer would do if it *wasn't* broken, but I see there are some test cases for it, so it must be something worth caring about. Maybe I'll have a look at it just in case it turns out that I actually am on a roll. Or I just could buy a lottery ticket ;)
Dave