Yoshiki,
I actually hadn't tried^^;, but you can load 2.x image onto 3.x image, once you change the #openSourceFilesForImage method, right?
I can load 2.8 image without changing the #openSourceFilesForImage method.
Only when I add class, then there is a problem. Please find attached log file.
To load 3.x image onto 2.x image, which sounds more useful than the opposide, requires some tweak.
An image editor is even more useful ;-)
Cheers,
PhiHo.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Yoshiki Ohshima" fwjg7834@mb.infoweb.ne.jp To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Cc: "PhiHo Hoang" phiho.hoang@rogers.com; sgelkins@bellsouth.net Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 1:02 PM Subject: Re: [ENH] Image Browser: for browsing code in the other .image file
Hello,
I guess this tool only works on image of the same version and
with a
change set only.
No, no, there is nothing that depends on specifically 3.2 or even 3.x, except a line in #openSourceFilesForImage: which specifies the .sources file name. As long as corresponding .changes exists, it should be possible to load V2 image onto V3 and vice versa.
I have quite a few of 1.x and 2.x and 3.x images on my machines (with full source and changes files) only the 3.x work as expected.
I actually hadn't tried^^;, but you can load 2.x image onto 3.x image, once you change the #openSourceFilesForImage method, right?
To load 3.x image onto 2.x image, which sounds more useful than the opposide, requires some tweak.
The best approach would be to add a flag that tells which version (loaded image or loading image) should be treated as the "base" one and which is "new". Then we wouldn't have to worry about making different versions of ImageBrowsers or back porting FileContentsBrowser to the older images.
-- Yoshiki
PS:
P.S. PhiHo, if you are going to reply my email, please include the entire part of this message. I still have a suspision that this one won't go through the normal channel. Thank you,
I received only 1 copy of your mail, so assumingly it did not get to the list.
I'm sending this with my ISP account's From: line to see if the From: line is all that matters... Thank you for all of your helps,