Hannes,
I repeated your steps in Squeak4.3-11860 and did not have an issue.
What's the build number in your image (i.e., is it older or newer than the image I'm using)?
Dale
----- Original Message ----- | From: "Dale Henrichs" dhenrich@vmware.com | To: "H. Hirzel" hannes.hirzel@gmail.com | Cc: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org | Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 9:55:46 AM | Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Installing Filetree | | Hannes, | | The stack looks like a FileTree bug.... I've created Issue #49[1]. | | I won't be able to track this bug down right away, but I'll get to it | as soon as I can ... | | Thanks, | | Dale | | [1] https://github.com/dalehenrich/filetree/issues/49 | | ----- Original Message ----- | | From: "H. Hirzel" hannes.hirzel@gmail.com | | To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" | | squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org | | Cc: "Dale Henrichs" dhenrich@vmware.com | | Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 9:35:50 AM | | Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Installing Filetree | | | | Dale, | | | | Thank you for answering quickly and for pointing out that I should | | go | | for the github version. | | I'll do that. | | | | In the meantime: | | It is a plain 4.3all-in one image from www.squeak.org updated to | | the | | last change. | | | | I filed in FileTree, but no git is installed. | | | | I clicked on 'open' in the Monticello browser, the result is shown | | in | | the screenshot. | | | | Maybe this helps. Otherwise I can upload the whole image. | | | | Hannes | | | | On 7/13/12, Dale Henrichs dhenrich@vmware.com wrote: | | > Hannes, | | > | | > Could I see a little more of the stack to get some context? | | > | | > I should point out that I don't necessarily keep the mcz files | | > up-to-date | | > and that the complete install of FileTree should involve a load | | > from a git | | > repository[1], to get the absolutely latest code. | | > | | > I'd also be interested to know which version of the | | > MonticelloFileTree-Core.squeak43 package that is loaded ... | | > | | > Finally I run tests using travisCI[2] for each push to github, | | > but | | > I test | | > against the image downloaded from [3] (including latest github | | > code | | > for | | > Squeak4.3 branch) and that passing all of the unit tests, with my | | > latest | | > updates... | | > | | > Dale | | > | | > [1] | | > https://github.com/dalehenrich/filetree/blob/pharo1.3/doc/SqueakInstall.md | | > [2] http://travis-ci.org/#!/dalehenrich/filetree/builds/1810028 | | > [3] http://ftp.squeak.org/4.3/Squeak4.3.zip | | > ----- Original Message ----- | | > | From: "H. Hirzel" hannes.hirzel@gmail.com | | > | To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" | | > squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org | | > | Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 3:16:13 PM | | > | Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] Installing Filetree | | > | | | > | Hi Bert | | > | | | > | Installer ss3 | | > | project: 'FileTree'; | | > | install: 'MonticelloFileTree-Core.squeak43'. | | > | | | > | worked fine in a fully updated image. | | > | | | > | I then did the following test. | | > | I created a package 'HHTestingFileTree' in the Monticello | | > | Browser | | > | and | | > | added a filetree repo on the local harddisk | | > | | | > | I created a class 'Dummy' in the category 'HHTestingFileTree' | | > | | | > | Then I wanted to save it in the Monticello Browser with 'save | | > | it'. | | > | | | > | A debugger came up breaking in MCScanner >> next | | > | | | > | next | | > | | c | | | > | stream skipSeparators. | | > | c := stream peek. | | > | c = $# ifTrue: [c := stream next; peek]. | | > | c = $' ifTrue: [^ self nextString]. | | > | c = $( ifTrue: [^ self nextArray]. | | > | c isAlphaNumeric ifTrue: [^ self nextSymbol]. <<<<<< c | | > | is | | > | nil | | > | self error: 'Unknown token type'. | | > | | | > | | | > | Am I missing something? Does it work for you | | > | | | > | --Hannes | | > | | | > | On 7/5/12, Bert Freudenberg bert@freudenbergs.de wrote: | | > | > On 2012-07-05, at 16:25, Levente Uzonyi wrote: | | > | > | | > | >> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Bert Freudenberg wrote: | | > | >> | | > | >>> with the fixes I posted today: | | > | >> | | > | >> As a side-effect several (~30) Monticello tests fail or | | > | >> raise | | > | >> an | | > | >> error. | | > | > | | > | > | | > | > Ah. I fixed that problem now. The test was using an | | > | > unexpectedly | | > | > short name | | > | > for a MC version ("MC1"). | | > | > | | > | > It's back down to 4 failures, no errors. | | > | > | | > | > - Bert - | | > | > | | > | > | | > | > | | > | > | | > | | | > | | | > | | > | | | |