On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:29:29PM -0500, Chris Muller wrote:
Just an FYI, the Magma test suite is pretty heavy on networking activity, but I didn't encounter any problems with this loaded.
So what needs to happen for us as a community to make a decision on whether to accept or reject this? I assume we will accept it, but maybe some of those more familiar with it can make some comments..? Who is our best networking expert who might want to review it and discuss?
I have merged Levente's Network-ul.100 updates into the current Squeak trunk, and made some additional changes to get unit tests working.
The updates are in the inbox in Network-dtl.123 and NetworkTests-dtl.28. I would appreciate if a couple of folks could load these updates, run the network tests, and let us know if any problems arise.
If there are no objections after a few days, I'll move the updates to trunk and we can sort out any remaining issues there.
Dave
- Chris
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 10:12 PM, commits@source.squeak.org wrote:
A new version of Network was added to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Network-ul.100.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: Network-ul.100 Author: ul Time: 12 December 2010, 4:49:19.894 am UUID: 81823263-c3d6-f949-a8b0-6a107dcb5322 Ancestors: Network-ul.99
Network changes from the EToys repository.
=============== Diff against Network-ul.99 ===============
<snip>