On 10/25/07, Peter William Lount peter@smalltalk.org wrote:
What are they?
Here. Again. http://sixtyk.blogspot.com/2007/05/threading.html
Sure, one only has to search the internet for "concurrency" and one sees a wide range of problems and potential solutions. Look at the Little Book of Semaphores for a breathtaking look at a few of the many possible solutions to various problems. Open your eyes to the wider horizon.
Open my eyes to the wider horizon of yesterday? I've seen it. It's complicated. I prefer to look at tomorrow.
I never said you stated that explicitly - I'd have to check all your postings to find that out. It's implied by what you are saying in many of your postings. At least that is the impression that I'm getting from your writing. You've certainly not acknowledged the opposite.
I really believe that over-all your intentions are good, but this seems downright dishonest. Either that are you simply don't read what I write. I have told you *every single time* you brought up this charge that I don't think it will solve all cases.
Ok, we're getting no where with this. I apologized to the list for what this thread has turned into, and I'll try to do a better job staying out of this sort of pointless "nu uh", "uh hu!", "nu uh!" discussions in the future. (if I start it again just warn me! It's a bit of a weakness of mine).