Thank you for the review! This was actually intended, or what would expect the following to do?
Dictionary fromKeys: 'wasda' values: '84265'
________________________________ Von: Squeak-dev squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org im Auftrag von Jakob Reschke forums.jakob@resfarm.de Gesendet: Sonntag, 17. November 2019 17:24:25 An: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: Collections-ct.860.mcz
Is there a strong indication to use add: anAssociation over at:put: here? The latter is more idiomatic and does not use the implementation detail that a dictionary is made up of associations.
<commits@source.squeak.orgmailto:commits@source.squeak.org> schrieb am Fr., 15. Nov. 2019, 13:59: A new version of Collections was added to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/Collections-ct.860.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: Collections-ct.860 Author: ct Time: 15 November 2019, 1:58:56.418005 pm UUID: f6364e7f-08c8-694a-9060-21bc0a0c28d4 Ancestors: Collections-pre.857
Add convenience constructor for Dictionary
Dictionary fromKeys: 'wasd' values: '8426'
=============== Diff against Collections-pre.857 ===============
Item was added: + ----- Method: Dictionary class>>fromKeys:values: (in category 'instance creation') ----- + fromKeys: keys values: values + + | dictionary | + self assert: [keys size = values size]. + dictionary := self new: keys size. + keys with: values do: [:key :value | + dictionary add: key -> value]. + ^ dictionary!