Ah, so there's probably something just different enough re: Debian vs Ubuntu (I presume) these days to throw a wrench into the works with the new approach. I'll do some poking around.
On Feb 6, 2018 7:28 PM, "Tobias Pape" Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
On 07.02.2018, at 01:14, Phil B pbpublist@gmail.com wrote:
I'll give it a shot. Really, I'm not at all surprised to be having an
SSL issue on Debian as I previously went over a year not being able to use the builds specifically due to a Ubuntu/Debian SSL lib version incompatibility (I *really* wish the Linux VM builds were statically linked as out of distro shared lib builds are just begging to break. Been dealing with this sort of thing since the early 90s on Linux)
That's exactly why I made some changes. SqueakSSL is now neither statically (I hd that, but there were issues and legal is unclear) nor dynamically linked agains libssl, but rather loads libssl at runtime...
Best regards -Tobias
On Feb 6, 2018 7:00 PM, "Tobias Pape" Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote: Hi Phil,
On 07.02.2018, at 00:50, Phil B pbpublist@gmail.com wrote:
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.0.2 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libssl.so.1.1 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i586/libssl.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libssl.so.1.0.0
Good! Or not, I'm puzzled ;) Could you please compile/run a debug-vm? It has some output, maybe it
helps :)
Best regards -Tobias
On Feb 6, 2018 5:56 PM, "Tobias Pape" Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Phil,
On 06.02.2018, at 23:49, Phil B pbpublist@gmail.com wrote:
It never gets that far (i.e. to log anything): the error occurs in
#primitiveSSLCreate and there is no log output. I've confirmed that the plugin exists in the 20180206 VM (and the image appears to be otherwise working). When I switch back to the 20171214 build with the same image, no error loading the plugin (other than the issue we're discussing re: some urls failing with -5)
can you give me the output of "locate libssl.so"?
Best regards -Tobias
On Feb 6, 2018 4:43 PM, "Tobias Pape" Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote: Hi Phil
On 06.02.2018, at 22:26, Phil B pbpublist@gmail.com wrote:
Tobias,
I tried the 32-bit 20180206 build and got Error: primitiveSSLCreate
failed. (I'd expect the same result on 64-bit but will give it a shot) This is using Cuis on Debian 9 stable. Assuming there are no image-side changes needed, this is probably be a shared library issue as I've seen this in the past when the VM is built on/for Ubuntu which was using a different SSL lib version than Debian stable. I'll try building a VM and report back the results (it will probably be late this week before I'll have time to get into it)
I have recently changed the SqueakSSL plugin. As long as you have
libssl:i386 installed, everything should work.
Can you give me the console output with logLeve:1 again?
Best regards -Tobias
Thanks, Phil
On Feb 1, 2018 1:51 PM, "Tobias Pape" Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote: Hi Phil,
On 22.12.2017, at 21:29, Phil B pbpublist@gmail.com wrote:
Tobias,
I saw there was a recent change to the VM related to this issue
so I downloaded a recent build from bintray (specifically the cogspurlinuxht 32- and 64-bit builds dated 201712142058) and tried them out on Debian 9. Unfortunately, this didn't seem to change very much for me (the majority of pages I was getting -5 on, I still do)
Here are a few sample urls I was having problems with: https://blog.jessfraz.com/post/containers-zones-jails-vms https://blog.keras.io/the-future-of-deep-learning.html https://danluu.com/cpu-bugs
Can you try with one of the latest vms?
https://bintray.com/opensmalltalk/vm/cog/
Best regards -Tobias
Thanks, Phil
On Aug 29, 2017 5:49 AM, "Tobias Pape" Das.Linux@gmx.de wrote: Hi Phil
On 24.08.2017, at 22:30, Phil B pbpublist@gmail.com wrote:
Also, if you ignore the name checking of the cert (i.e. just
blindly accept it... dangerous to do with anything important) I've found that you'll often either get a connection timeout or -5 error from the plugin. Not sure if this is specifically related to SAN support (i.e. is there additional negotiation that needs to be done?) or if there are some newer https features that need to be added...
can you tell me your platform and the plugin version you are
using? I'd really like to get rid of those -5's :)
Best regard -tobias
On Aug 23, 2017 2:37 AM, "Marcel Taeumel" marcel.taeumel@hpi.de
wrote:
Note that due to incomplete or missing SAN support on some
platforms, using alternative names can still raise a SqueakSSLCertificateError:
WebClient httpGet: 'https://google.com'
Best, Marcel > Am 22.08.2017 22:14:38 schrieb Ron Teitelbaum <ron@usmedrec.com
:
> > SqueakSSL > > WebClient httpGet: 'https://www.google.com' > > Ron > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Eliot Miranda <
eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > what are people using for https support? > > _,,,^..^,,,_ > best, Eliot > > > >