Milan Zimmermann milan.zimmermann@sympatico.ca writes:
1) "The Board" would start with defining what Squeak is - "Squeak" as a
small "SqueakCore" plus "Packages" - Unfortunately I can only be intuitive here, not saying I know what should be in "SqueakCore", likely it would be much smaller than current Squeak, without Morphic, MVC (UI loadable, is that possible?)
Giovanni Giorgi puso en su mail :
I have proposed the SqueakCore ideas about two years ago, at the end of 2004 See http://people.squeakfoundation.org/article/41.html
This is SqueakKernel.image and Pavel is doing it for a while.
And Spoon is older and backed by Craig mastery.
My SqueakLight is the most tiny working set what have Morphic and could grow and dated of 2003. It's a beginner exercise about dependencies, what the several Squeak "pieces" should like for reach a particular purpose, what was needed for have any code originated in any Squeak could run, etc
I have at this time a working system, what could grow until understand complicated .sar produced by regular 3.9. Not only this, the same .sar could load in 3.9 or SqueakLight, (Rompecabezas, LogicCircus,SqueakRailRoad) is running. And I could have MorphicWrappers, MathMorphs, Monticello and friends (including Monticello 2), Comanche + HttpView + Seaside, IRC.
What is needed is merge all in one killer SqueakCore , but at some time in future this happen.
Edgar
__________________________________________________ Pregunt�. Respond�. Descubr�. Todo lo que quer�as saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, est� en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). �Probalo ya! http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas