----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Johnson" jason.johnson.081@gmail.com To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:31 PM Subject: Re: Concurrent Futures
On 10/29/07, Rob Withers reefedjib@yahoo.com wrote:
This is what I am trying to do with SqueakElib. Any old object referenced in the system is an eventual local ref, but the system should handle promises or non-local refs anywhere.
Are you going to make the "vats" Smalltalk processes?
They already are.
Are you going to isolate them from other Smalltalk processes in the same image? If so then I will probably have some synergy with that.
I am trying to ensure that objects in one Vat don't get directly manipulated by objects in other Processes.
Rob