j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
Ah right. My bad. But I still like the idea of the revision system providing some kind of tagging so the Universe code can automatically look for updates in specific "guaranteed to be stable" branches.> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:23:56 +0100> From: keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk> To: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org> Subject: Re: Error updating universe list> > I am not saying that Monticello doesnt know how to provide resolution of > Universe dependencies.> > I am saying that if you install a monticello package from a url, and > that package attempts to load other 'specific' packages due to its > internal dependencies, the url loading context may have no repositories > registered in which monticello can look to find those requirements.> > Keith> _________________________________________________________________ Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary! http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlmailtextlink
Attachments:
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org