Edward P Luwish eluwish@uswest.com writes:
This looks like a very good place to start. I had not planned to go "morphic" but there's always a first time (also, this is supposed to run on a PDA - I don't know yet how much Squeak will fit on it). Thank you very much for the quick response.
I've also been wondering how much of the current Squeak would still fit onto a PDA. It sure looks like Morphic is currently to "heavy" in memory and cpu requirements to be workable.
Marc
It's not a PDA, but, a 33 mhz 040 on a B&W screen does run morphic ok. Not fast, ok. It's usable. The recent changes in 2.3 and 2.4 have greatly sped things up.
cheers
bruce
Marc Nijdam writes:
Edward P Luwish eluwish@uswest.com writes:
This looks like a very good place to start. I had not planned to go "morphic" but there's always a first time (also, this is supposed to run on a PDA - I don't know yet how much Squeak will fit on it). Thank you very much for the quick response.
I've also been wondering how much of the current Squeak would still fit onto a PDA. It sure looks like Morphic is currently to "heavy" in memory and cpu requirements to be workable.
Marc
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org