Marcus Denker marcus@ira.uka.de wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:08:24AM +0100, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
And the SUnit version included there is still 3.0 although there is an updated version (3.1) on SqueakMaop (updated by Diego Gomez Deck and Francisco Garau; original port by Joseph Pelrine, Stephane Ducasse and Ned Konz and I think). That version conforms better with the SUnit implementations for other Smalltalk dialects.
I think this is not yet on SqueakMap (I can't find it).
Marcus
You are right Marcus. It is here http://swiki.gsug.org:8080/sqfixes/3015.html.
I remember now that Diego was asking us to test it. I have actually been using it for 12 days now and it works fine.
Any other test experiences?
Diego says that he will create a SqueakMap entry after it has been tested.
-- Hannes
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:31:10AM +0100, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
You are right Marcus. It is here http://swiki.gsug.org:8080/sqfixes/3015.html.
I remember now that Diego was asking us to test it. I have actually been using it for 12 days now and it works fine.
Any other test experiences?
Diego says that he will create a SqueakMap entry after it has been tested.
I don't think there's any need to not add un-tested stuff to SqueakMap: That's why you can say it's alpha.
So we should add this right now, and I vote for, at least, two packages:
-> Sunit 3.0 removal (This will be added to the update-stream of 3.5 ASAP) -> SUnit 3.1 This should be a SAR-File containing the original sources, right as they are generated with Rosetta. These changesets should be bundelt using SAR. (Maybe it would make sense to have two packages: SUnit-3.1 and Sunit-3.1-Tests. Tests should be in seperate packages, allways)
Marcus
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org