Stef,
the SarBuilder is not part of the image, is an outside package, the fix works, but don't need to be an update
regards
-----Mensaje original----- De: stéphane ducasse [SMTP:ducasse@iam.unibe.ch] Enviado el: Jueves 30 de Septiembre de 2004 16:02 Para: The general-purpose Squeak developers list Asunto: [UPDATE] please check and report problems :)
hi guys
I pushed a couple of cs in the unstable stream.
- Please check your your fixes are solving the problems you were fixing.
- There are some pending cs with a conflicts tag by marcus or me so
please have a look (I do not want to solve conflicts nor can nor is willing to push them in unstable in that state).
- Please have a look at the enh were I explicit mentioned help.
Stef
Am 30.09.2004 um 21:20 schrieb Magistrello Alejandro (SFA):
Stef,
the SarBuilder is not part of the image, is an outside package, the fix works, but don't need to be an update
These in-image packages are a real pain: There is no support in the tools to know what part of the system you are not supposed to change, no support to break a change up into pieces. As the system is now, adding more "in image" packages would lead to a real problem soon.
Marcus
Yes so may be we need real package and mark cs or class definition with them
Stef
On 1 oct. 04, at 08:05, Marcus Denker wrote:
Am 30.09.2004 um 21:20 schrieb Magistrello Alejandro (SFA):
Stef,
the SarBuilder is not part of the image, is an outside package, the fix works, but don't need to be an update
These in-image packages are a real pain: There is no support in the tools to know what part of the system you are not supposed to change, no support to break a change up into pieces. As the system is now, adding more "in image" packages would lead to a real problem soon.
Marcus
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Magistrello Alejandro (SFA) -
Marcus Denker -
stéphane ducasse