On 27 October 2012 23:37, commits@source.squeak.org wrote:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of KernelTests to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/KernelTests-fbs.235.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: KernelTests-fbs.235 Author: fbs Time: 27 October 2012, 11:37:53.223 pm UUID: ab0d84db-c1bc-40d0-bd90-786dcd6989b5 Ancestors: KernelTests-ul.234
Mark this test as an expected failure for the 4.4 release. Unmark it at the start of the 4.5 cycle!
=============== Diff against KernelTests-ul.234 ===============
Item was added:
- ----- Method: LargeNegativeIntegerTest>>expectedFailures (in category 'as yet unclassified') -----
- expectedFailures
^ #(testMinimumNegativeIntegerArithmetic).!
IIRC this test can only pass with suitable VM changes being made. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7705 mentions that the fix is in VMMaker-dtl.286, so does this mean that with the interpreter VM this test will pass, but with Cog (the VM we use in CI tests) the test will fail?
frank
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:41:15PM +0100, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 27 October 2012 23:37, commits@source.squeak.org wrote:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of KernelTests to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/KernelTests-fbs.235.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: KernelTests-fbs.235 Author: fbs Time: 27 October 2012, 11:37:53.223 pm UUID: ab0d84db-c1bc-40d0-bd90-786dcd6989b5 Ancestors: KernelTests-ul.234
Mark this test as an expected failure for the 4.4 release. Unmark it at the start of the 4.5 cycle!
=============== Diff against KernelTests-ul.234 ===============
Item was added:
- ----- Method: LargeNegativeIntegerTest>>expectedFailures (in category 'as yet unclassified') -----
- expectedFailures
^ #(testMinimumNegativeIntegerArithmetic).!IIRC this test can only pass with suitable VM changes being made. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7705 mentions that the fix is in VMMaker-dtl.286, so does this mean that with the interpreter VM this test will pass, but with Cog (the VM we use in CI tests) the test will fail?
Yes, that's right. It will fail with older interpreter VMs also.
Dave
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:34AM -0400, David T. Lewis wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:41:15PM +0100, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 27 October 2012 23:37, commits@source.squeak.org wrote:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of KernelTests to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/KernelTests-fbs.235.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: KernelTests-fbs.235 Author: fbs Time: 27 October 2012, 11:37:53.223 pm UUID: ab0d84db-c1bc-40d0-bd90-786dcd6989b5 Ancestors: KernelTests-ul.234
Mark this test as an expected failure for the 4.4 release. Unmark it at the start of the 4.5 cycle!
=============== Diff against KernelTests-ul.234 ===============
Item was added:
- ----- Method: LargeNegativeIntegerTest>>expectedFailures (in category 'as yet unclassified') -----
- expectedFailures
^ #(testMinimumNegativeIntegerArithmetic).!IIRC this test can only pass with suitable VM changes being made. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7705 mentions that the fix is in VMMaker-dtl.286, so does this mean that with the interpreter VM this test will pass, but with Cog (the VM we use in CI tests) the test will fail?
Yes, that's right. It will fail with older interpreter VMs also.
Frank,
If you want to try running the test suite with an interpreter VM, I installed a locally built VM on box3.squeak.org that can be used to drive the tests. This is installed as /usr/local/bin/squeak, and can be used for running both 32-bit and 64-bit Squeak images.
This VM is built from latest VMMaker and squeakvm.org sources using the ~lewis/VMUnixBuild/VMUnixBuild.st script (attached), which now seems to work fairly reliably. It is *not* suitable for general distribution, so I would appreciate if we can all be careful to refer to it as a local build, and not as "the standard VM" or any words to that effect.
Note, the latest standard interpreter VM (*) is not working on our box3.squeak.org server due to a Linux glibc compatibility issue (/lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found), hence the need for a local build.
(*) http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.10.2.2614-linux_i386.tar.gz
Dave
On 28 October 2012 13:04, David T. Lewis lewis@mail.msen.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:34AM -0400, David T. Lewis wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:41:15PM +0100, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 27 October 2012 23:37, commits@source.squeak.org wrote:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of KernelTests to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/KernelTests-fbs.235.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: KernelTests-fbs.235 Author: fbs Time: 27 October 2012, 11:37:53.223 pm UUID: ab0d84db-c1bc-40d0-bd90-786dcd6989b5 Ancestors: KernelTests-ul.234
Mark this test as an expected failure for the 4.4 release. Unmark it at the start of the 4.5 cycle!
=============== Diff against KernelTests-ul.234 ===============
Item was added:
- ----- Method: LargeNegativeIntegerTest>>expectedFailures (in category 'as yet unclassified') -----
- expectedFailures
^ #(testMinimumNegativeIntegerArithmetic).!IIRC this test can only pass with suitable VM changes being made. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7705 mentions that the fix is in VMMaker-dtl.286, so does this mean that with the interpreter VM this test will pass, but with Cog (the VM we use in CI tests) the test will fail?
Yes, that's right. It will fail with older interpreter VMs also.
Frank,
If you want to try running the test suite with an interpreter VM, I installed a locally built VM on box3.squeak.org that can be used to drive the tests. This is installed as /usr/local/bin/squeak, and can be used for running both 32-bit and 64-bit Squeak images.
This VM is built from latest VMMaker and squeakvm.org sources using the ~lewis/VMUnixBuild/VMUnixBuild.st script (attached), which now seems to work fairly reliably. It is *not* suitable for general distribution, so I would appreciate if we can all be careful to refer to it as a local build, and not as "the standard VM" or any words to that effect.
Thanks Dave, I'll be able to pick this up in a few hours, once my boys have gone to bed. I'll add a new script to the squeak-ci repo that refers to the local build. (It's nearly time to refactor the build scripts, too.)
Note, the latest standard interpreter VM (*) is not working on our box3.squeak.org server due to a Linux glibc compatibility issue (/lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found), hence the need for a local build.
Yes, I ran into this the last time I tried to set up an interpreter VM build, thanks to the awesomeness of CentOS.
frank
(*) http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.10.2.2614-linux_i386.tar.gz
Dave
On 28 October 2012 16:42, Frank Shearar frank.shearar@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 October 2012 13:04, David T. Lewis lewis@mail.msen.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:39:34AM -0400, David T. Lewis wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:41:15PM +0100, Frank Shearar wrote:
On 27 October 2012 23:37, commits@source.squeak.org wrote:
Frank Shearar uploaded a new version of KernelTests to project The Inbox: http://source.squeak.org/inbox/KernelTests-fbs.235.mcz
==================== Summary ====================
Name: KernelTests-fbs.235 Author: fbs Time: 27 October 2012, 11:37:53.223 pm UUID: ab0d84db-c1bc-40d0-bd90-786dcd6989b5 Ancestors: KernelTests-ul.234
Mark this test as an expected failure for the 4.4 release. Unmark it at the start of the 4.5 cycle!
=============== Diff against KernelTests-ul.234 ===============
Item was added:
- ----- Method: LargeNegativeIntegerTest>>expectedFailures (in category 'as yet unclassified') -----
- expectedFailures
^ #(testMinimumNegativeIntegerArithmetic).!IIRC this test can only pass with suitable VM changes being made. http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7705 mentions that the fix is in VMMaker-dtl.286, so does this mean that with the interpreter VM this test will pass, but with Cog (the VM we use in CI tests) the test will fail?
Yes, that's right. It will fail with older interpreter VMs also.
Frank,
If you want to try running the test suite with an interpreter VM, I installed a locally built VM on box3.squeak.org that can be used to drive the tests. This is installed as /usr/local/bin/squeak, and can be used for running both 32-bit and 64-bit Squeak images.
This VM is built from latest VMMaker and squeakvm.org sources using the ~lewis/VMUnixBuild/VMUnixBuild.st script (attached), which now seems to work fairly reliably. It is *not* suitable for general distribution, so I would appreciate if we can all be careful to refer to it as a local build, and not as "the standard VM" or any words to that effect.
Thanks Dave, I'll be able to pick this up in a few hours, once my boys have gone to bed. I'll add a new script to the squeak-ci repo that refers to the local build. (It's nearly time to refactor the build scripts, too.)
OK, I have a SqueakTrunkOnInterpreter job: http://squeakci.org/job/SqueakTrunkOnInterpreter/3/
5 failures, all rather familiar by now:
KernelTests.Chronology.TimeStampTest.testFromSeconds KernelTests.Chronology.TimeStampTest.testReadFromA1 NetworkTests.Kernel.SocketTest.testSendTimeout Tests.Localization.LocaleTest.testLocaleChanged Tests.Release.ReleaseTest.testNoObsoleteClasses
frank
Note, the latest standard interpreter VM (*) is not working on our box3.squeak.org server due to a Linux glibc compatibility issue (/lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found), hence the need for a local build.
Yes, I ran into this the last time I tried to set up an interpreter VM build, thanks to the awesomeness of CentOS.
frank
(*) http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.10.2.2614-linux_i386.tar.gz
Dave
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
David T. Lewis -
Frank Shearar