At Tue, 25 Nov 2008 11:06:56 -0600, Ralph Johnson wrote:

I'm sure I signed it. But maybe I never sent it in. It is not clear where to send it. Should it be sent to Viewpoints?

We don't have your name on our record. If you think you had contributed any code under SqL, please. But even if not, if you don't mind to spend a postage stamp (or a scanned document sent in an email is ok, too), we welcome the agreement!

-- Yoshiki

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:38:45AM -0700, Matthew Fulmer wrote:

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 08:37:31AM -0700, Matthew Fulmer wrote:

...

I took a look through yoshiki's 3.10 history database [1], and saw 4 names I immediately recognized as not having signed the agreement:

Keith Hodges

Nevermind Keith. I was using an old version of the signers list. Your signature is recorded in the latest version

Keith is in the Authorship>>newContributors list:

newContributors

"This is a list of all Squeak contributors who started after the relicensing effort was started and therefore know that the license is under MIT.

Sep 30th 2008 ---

initials name" ^ #( 'aw' 'Alessandro Warth' 'be' 'Bernd Eckardt' 'cjs' '(from trac)' 'jf' 'Jan Fietz' 'lg' 'Luke Gorrie' 'jl' 'Jens Linke' 'JSM' 'John S Mcintosh' 'thf' 'an Impara employee' 'sjg' 'Simon Guest' 'kph' 'Keith Hodges' 'kks' 'kks' 'meta-auto' 'generated code' 'programmatic' 'generated code' )

Should Matthew Fulmer (mtf), Ralph Johnson (rej), and Bryce Kampjes (wbk) be added to this list as well? All their contributions are between February and November 2007

Yoshiki Ohshima writes:

I updated the SqueakSource package.

http://www.squeaksource.com/MethodAuthorship/MethodAuthorship-yo.6.mcz

should contain the latest additions since last update (including Eliot Miranda, who stated he is going to the a new contributor). I haven't added Ralph, Matthew, Bryce yet. (Keith is in the new contributors list).

Everything I've contributed in MIT licenced. Some is SqueakL/MIT where you're free to use it under either.

Bryce