I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
Thanks, Aik-Siong Koh
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll start working on it next week or so
The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a String with the test input. Is that insufficient for some reason?
Cheers, Josh
Matthew Fulmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll start working on it next week or so
Text file was just an example. But the files could be images, binaries, etc. Then there are folders or directories too. A complete solution would be great for testing and quality assurance in general. Aik-Siong Koh
Joshua Gargus-2 wrote:
The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a String with the test input. Is that insufficient for some reason?
Cheers, Josh
Matthew Fulmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll start working on it next week or so
MCZ is meant for development, not distribution. Use SAR for that, which can bundle arbitrary files. .
- Bert -
Am 17.10.2008 um 04:20 schrieb askoh askoh@askoh.com:
Text file was just an example. But the files could be images, binaries, etc. Then there are folders or directories too. A complete solution would be great for testing and quality assurance in general. Aik-Siong Koh
Joshua Gargus-2 wrote:
The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a String with the test input. Is that insufficient for some reason?
Cheers, Josh
Matthew Fulmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll start working on it next week or so
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Storing-non-code-files-in-Monticello-tp20016782p200260... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks, for more info: http://www.visoracle.com/squeak/faq/sar-installer.html
Bert Freudenberg wrote:
MCZ is meant for development, not distribution. Use SAR for that, which can bundle arbitrary files. .
- Bert -
Am 17.10.2008 um 04:20 schrieb askoh askoh@askoh.com:
Text file was just an example. But the files could be images, binaries, etc. Then there are folders or directories too. A complete solution would be great for testing and quality assurance in general. Aik-Siong Koh
Joshua Gargus-2 wrote:
The quickest approach is to simply define a method that answers a String with the test input. Is that insufficient for some reason?
Cheers, Josh
Matthew Fulmer wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:24:31PM -0700, askoh wrote:
I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
No. I'm pretty sure we havn't yet implemented that feature. I'll start working on it next week or so
-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Storing-non-code-files-in-Monticello-tp20016782p200260... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 16/10/2008, at 17:24, askoh wrote:
I would like store some ordinary text files that are used as test inputs to some code. How can I save a Monticello package with the test text files together with the code? Can I do that without making the text files as code in Squeak?
Thanks, Aik-Siong Koh
Many moons ago, I cook how have any kind of files in Monticello.
http://www.squeaksource.com/Rompecabezas.html
Date is 2004...
Download and expand with a .zip reader, so you see yourself. As nobody listen me or pretend my English is too bad, I only share this with kind people who contact me in Skype as edgardec.
Edgar aka Advocatus Diaboli
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org