After a lot of ‘fun’ yesterday I managed to compile a debug cog arm vm a few minutes ago. It started up loaded the image and very quickly failed. The really cool part is that it failed ‘politely’ by detecting its own problem and opening a debugger (squeak, not gdb) and it failed pretty much exactly where the simulation failed last week. Which means around 130 million bytecodes were translated and run, with some 2500 compiled methods translated and at least one full garbage collection.
https://plus.google.com/107730379469391818270/posts/hiGXJeLjbUq
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Science adjusts its views based on what is observed. Faith denies observation so belief can be preserved
Yay !
Karl
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 8:30 PM, tim Rowledge tim@rowledge.org wrote:
After a lot of ‘fun’ yesterday I managed to compile a debug cog arm vm a few minutes ago. It started up loaded the image and very quickly failed. The really cool part is that it failed ‘politely’ by detecting its own problem and opening a debugger (squeak, not gdb) and it failed pretty much exactly where the simulation failed last week. Which means around 130 million bytecodes were translated and run, with some 2500 compiled methods translated and at least one full garbage collection.
https://plus.google.com/107730379469391818270/posts/hiGXJeLjbUq
tim
tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Science adjusts its views based on what is observed. Faith denies observation so belief can be preserved
Real Cool!!!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 11:30:03 -0700, tim Rowledge tim@rowledge.org wrote:
After a lot of fun yesterday I managed to compile a debug cog arm vm a few minutes ago. It started up loaded the image and very quickly failed. The really cool part is that it failed politely by detecting its own problem and opening a debugger (squeak, not gdb) and it failed pretty much exactly where the simulation failed last week. Which means around 130 million bytecodes were translated and run, with some 2500 compiled methods translated and at least one full garbage collection.
https://plus.google.com/107730379469391818270/posts/hiGXJeLjbUq
tim
----------------------------------------------------------- Louis LaBrunda Keystone Software Corp. SkypeMe callto://PhotonDemon mailto:Lou@Keystone-Software.com http://www.Keystone-Software.com
Yay! Is it far enough so I can run benchmarks against RSqueakVM on my Raspberry Pi? Supposedly the RPython JIT isn't quite as advanced on ARM as it is on x86, and I would like to quantify this against Cog on that architecture.
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/ARM-Cog-fires-up-tp4823011p4823026.html Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 29-04-2015, at 1:11 PM, timfelgentreff timfelgentreff@gmail.com wrote:
Yay! Is it far enough so I can run benchmarks against RSqueakVM on my Raspberry Pi? Supposedly the RPython JIT isn't quite as advanced on ARM as it is on x86, and I would like to quantify this against Cog on that architecture.
Not even close! It’ll be a while before we get to that stage I think.
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Programmers do it bit by bit.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
karl ramberg -
Louis LaBrunda -
tim Rowledge -
timfelgentreff