j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
Keith mate,
We are here to cut code.
You would be a lot happier if you first perused the Skeptical Enquirer's Field Guide to Critical Thinking.
http://www.csicop.org/si/9012/critical-thinking.html
Then you would be happy that any rational discipline cannot even discuss the validity or compare religious beliefs, art, etc because is doesn't meet any, let along all the conditions. Valid, not sure, but arguable no.
Further, and more to the point, there is no one interpretation of the word "know" or any of the other words that bother you. All becomes clear in the context of a rational argument.
Brent programmer, philosopher, labourer, martyr
----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org