I've put together SAR archives for OSProcess, CommandShell, and IOHandle and updated the SqueakMap registrations.
Kudos to all who are putting SM together, this is great stuff!
The SAR archive and loader was particularly gratifying. I was able to get the IOHandle changes to load automatically from a single SAR file. Don't look at how I did it, it's ugly. But at least it was possible, and SqueakMap and the SAR loader make it look easy.
Dave
On Sunday 01 December 2002 12:21 pm, David T. Lewis wrote:
The SAR archive and loader was particularly gratifying. I was able to get the IOHandle changes to load automatically from a single SAR file. Don't look at how I did it, it's ugly. But at least it was possible, and SqueakMap and the SAR loader make it look easy.
Looks good to me.
You should consider using the SARBuilder to make your archives, as you don't have to do manual zip building. You can do like Daniel did with the RB and make a class-side method somewhere that builds a SAR.
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 12:37:40PM -0800, Ned Konz wrote:
On Sunday 01 December 2002 12:21 pm, David T. Lewis wrote:
The SAR archive and loader was particularly gratifying. I was able to get the IOHandle changes to load automatically from a single SAR file. Don't look at how I did it, it's ugly. But at least it was possible, and SqueakMap and the SAR loader make it look easy.
Looks good to me.
You should consider using the SARBuilder to make your archives, as you don't have to do manual zip building. You can do like Daniel did with the RB and make a class-side method somewhere that builds a SAR.
Good idea, I'll use SARBuilder in the future. In this case, I wanted to build things with existing change set files to make sure I knew exactly what went into the packages, so it was easier to just hack it into the install script.
Dave
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
David T. Lewis -
Ned Konz