Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
1. SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with Monticello.
2. It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
3. Having said that, try this http://76.74.255.163:8080
It's a replacement for the SqueakMap server I've had on the back burner. Give it a try. I'm pretty sure it'll crash, but you could help by telling me what happens when you use it.
That's all I can suggest, Chris
I found that I couldn't register to http://76.74.255.163:8080. My account is registered but I can't login! It says It will confirm me immediately but I didn't receive such a mail! Anyway, I can't register a project without the administrator's acception.
2012/2/23 Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com
Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
- SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with
Monticello.
It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
Having said that, try this http://76.74.255.163:8080
It's a replacement for the SqueakMap server I've had on the back burner. Give it a try. I'm pretty sure it'll crash, but you could help by telling me what happens when you use it.
That's all I can suggest, Chris
I connected to http://76.74.255.163:8080/storeString and It crashed. It seems that the server is run by squeak
2012/2/23 Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com
Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
- SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with
Monticello.
It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
Having said that, try this http://76.74.255.163:8080
It's a replacement for the SqueakMap server I've had on the back burner. Give it a try. I'm pretty sure it'll crash, but you could help by telling me what happens when you use it.
That's all I can suggest, Chris
Thank you, but I thought SqueakMap is more convenient then SqueakSource. SqueakMap works 100% in Squeak, but SqueakSource, which the most users use, have to get the administrator's acception and have to search the web browser...
2012/2/23 Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com
Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
- SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with
Monticello.
It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
Having said that, try this http://76.74.255.163:8080
It's a replacement for the SqueakMap server I've had on the back burner. Give it a try. I'm pretty sure it'll crash, but you could help by telling me what happens when you use it.
That's all I can suggest, Chris
On 23 February 2012 08:41, 강진오 jinoh67@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, but I thought SqueakMap is more convenient then SqueakSource. SqueakMap works 100% in Squeak, but SqueakSource, which the most users use, have to get the administrator's acception and have to search the web browser...
Well, adding a new repository requires using your browser. But uploading new versions of your package, or downloading packages, you do from within your image.
frank
2012/2/23 Chris Cunnington smalltalktelevision@gmail.com
Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
- SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with
Monticello.
It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
Having said that, try this http://76.74.255.163:8080
It's a replacement for the SqueakMap server I've had on the back burner. Give it a try. I'm pretty sure it'll crash, but you could help by telling me what happens when you use it.
That's all I can suggest, Chris
On 02/23/2012 07:03 AM, Chris Cunnington wrote:
Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
- SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with Monticello.
SM is indeed old, but it still works.
- It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
Not really true. Yes, I (the author of SM) am using Pharo for my current two private projects - but that doesn't mean I am "gone" nor that I don't care for SM anymore. At the same time, I am not spending much time on SM.
Now, Nicolas and I are working on SmalltalkHub which I think could replace both SS and SM and end up *really* cool. Nicolas has done a fantastic job so far.
But more on that in another post. :)
regards, Göran
Found that http://source.squeak.org/ is newest, because it is newest. It doesn't have many packages. But I prefer http://source.squeak.org/ then http://www.squeaksource.org/, and I changed MCHttpRepository class>>creationTemplate to: creationTemplate ^self creationTemplateLocation: 'http://source.squeak.com/ProjectName' user: 'KJO' password: '******'
2012/2/24 Göran Krampe goran@krampe.se
On 02/23/2012 07:03 AM, Chris Cunnington wrote:
Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
- SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with
Monticello.
SM is indeed old, but it still works.
- It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
Not really true. Yes, I (the author of SM) am using Pharo for my current two private projects - but that doesn't mean I am "gone" nor that I don't care for SM anymore. At the same time, I am not spending much time on SM.
Now, Nicolas and I are working on SmalltalkHub which I think could replace both SS and SM and end up *really* cool. Nicolas has done a fantastic job so far.
But more on that in another post. :)
regards, Göran
2012/2/24 Göran Krampe goran@krampe.se
On 02/23/2012 07:03 AM, Chris Cunnington wrote:
Hi Jin-oh,
Hmm.. what to say.
- SqueakMap is old and most people use http://www.squeaksource.com with
Monticello.
SM is indeed old, but it still works.
- It's an orphan because the person who built it has gone to Pharo.
Not really true. Yes, I (the author of SM) am using Pharo for my current two private projects - but that doesn't mean I am "gone" nor that I don't care for SM anymore. At the same time, I am not spending much time on SM.
Now, Nicolas and I are working on SmalltalkHub which I think could replace both SS and SM and end up *really* cool. Nicolas has done a fantastic job so far.
But more on that in another post. :)
regards, Göran
Any news on SmalltalkHub ?
The project looks like a nice extension of SqueakSource and SqueakMap.
Karl
On 03/06/2012 11:25 AM, karl ramberg wrote:
Any news on SmalltalkHub ? The project looks like a nice extension of SqueakSource and SqueakMap.
Yes, SmalltalkHub is moving forward and I dare say it is not merely an "extension" but in fact a super set of SS. I do think we could also make it a super set of SM if we wanted to.
regards, Göran
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org