Okay, at he SqueakSSL plugin was replaced with the one from https://github.com/itsmeront/squeakssl/releases for all platforms. Tested it on Linux, worked. Fabio verified Mac. Craig signed it too.
Thanks for your help with this shakeout. Can anyone think of anything else we need to do?
The look and preferences of 4.6 were set up by Marcel and (I think) others at HPI. Marcel made tremendous contributions to the IDE of 4.6 and so it makes sense to let him finish his vision of what the release IDE should look and feel like. As a whole, Squeak is a successful example of design by committee, but an IDE's look and feel, like a piece of art, can benefit from being designed by a few or single mind due to the more cohesive vision of all the components.
I certainly won't be running with gray windows -- it provides way too little delineation of background windows, leaving me with only the window position and its symbology (letters) for identification.
However, I can appreciate the initial "look" that the image opens with. Like a classic movie, the black and white harkens back to original Smalltalk-80, but that modern drop-shadow subtlely indicating something more. Kinda pretty..
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Stéphane Rollandin lecteur@zogotounga.net wrote:
Thanks for your help with this shakeout. Can anyone think of anything else we need to do?
Is the color theme still grey upon grey ?
Stef
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:02:16PM -0500, Chris Muller wrote:
The look and preferences of 4.6 were set up by Marcel and (I think) others at HPI. Marcel made tremendous contributions to the IDE of 4.6 and so it makes sense to let him finish his vision of what the release IDE should look and feel like. As a whole, Squeak is a successful example of design by committee, but an IDE's look and feel, like a piece of art, can benefit from being designed by a few or single mind due to the more cohesive vision of all the components.
Excellent summary, and FWIW I agree. Marcel also provided justification for this based on the reactions of many new users to the Squeak image. Even though I do not personally like the grey look, I recognize that the initial reaction of new users on first exposure to the release image is more important than my personal preference.
I certainly won't be running with gray windows -- it provides way too little delineation of background windows, leaving me with only the window position and its symbology (letters) for identification.
Me too. I think we should have a wiki page for "top 10 horrible preferences and how to make them go away".
;-)
Dave
However, I can appreciate the initial "look" that the image opens with. Like a classic movie, the black and white harkens back to original Smalltalk-80, but that modern drop-shadow subtlely indicating something more. Kinda pretty..
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:18 PM, St??phane Rollandin lecteur@zogotounga.net wrote:
Thanks for your help with this shakeout. Can anyone think of anything else we need to do?
Is the color theme still grey upon grey ?
Stef
On 21 Jul 2015 at 21:36, David T. Lewis wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:02:16PM -0500, Chris Muller wrote:
The look and preferences of 4.6 were set up by Marcel and (I
think)
others at HPI. Marcel made tremendous contributions to the IDE of
4.6
and so it makes sense to let him finish his vision of what the
release
IDE should look and feel like. As a whole, Squeak is a
successful
example of design by committee, but an IDE's look and feel, like
a
piece of art, can benefit from being designed by a few or single
mind
due to the more cohesive vision of all the components.
Excellent summary, and FWIW I agree. Marcel also provided justification for this based on the reactions of many new users to the Squeak image. Even though I do not personally like the grey look, I recognize that the initial reaction of new users on first exposure to the release image is more important than my personal preference.
I certainly won't be running with gray windows -- it provides way
too
little delineation of background windows, leaving me with only
the
window position and its symbology (letters) for identification.
Me too. I think we should have a wiki page for "top 10 horrible preferences and how to make them go away".
+1
- Dan
On 21-07-2015, at 6:02 PM, Chris Muller asqueaker@gmail.com wrote:
but an IDE's look and feel, like a piece of art, can benefit from being designed by a few or single mind due to the more cohesive vision of all the components.
This is usually true but I notice that at least the quit ‘save changes before quitting?’ dialogue still has the bluey colours. This may perhaps be a cache that needs clearing?
And the Release Notes text jars a bit - for 4.6 there *isn’t* a new vm for the ARM - we only did the spur vm for ARM. In fact right now it would take some effort to make a plain ARM cog vm since the strictures of the abort trap etc mean there isn’t a suitable way to discriminate the nmethod type.
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Oxymorons: Software documentation
but an IDE's look and feel, like a piece of art, can benefit from being designed by a few or single mind due to the more cohesive vision of all the components.
This is usually true but I notice that at least the quit ‘save changes before quitting?’ dialogue still has the bluey colours. This may perhaps be a cache that needs clearing?
No, that's the color they are.
And the Release Notes text jars a bit - for 4.6 there *isn’t* a new vm for the ARM - we only did the spur vm for ARM. In fact right now it would take some effort to make a plain ARM cog vm since the strictures of the abort trap etc mean there isn’t a suitable way to discriminate the nmethod type.
We had MONTHS for people to make suggestions for the 4.6 release. Now that we've just collapsed the .spur branch to make trunk 5.0 earlier this week is not the time to start making suggestions for 4.6. There will be no more changes to 4.6, but there's still time for 5.0 -- where I might need to REMOVE that line from the release notes unless we can get it into the All-in-One...
On 22-07-2015, at 8:04 AM, Chris Muller asqueaker@gmail.com wrote:
And the Release Notes text jars a bit - for 4.6 there *isn’t* a new vm for the ARM - we only did the spur vm for ARM. In fact right now it would take some effort to make a plain ARM cog vm since the strictures of the abort trap etc mean there isn’t a suitable way to discriminate the nmethod type.
We had MONTHS for people to make suggestions for the 4.6 release.
And somet1mes nobody notises the ovbious spilling or gramer mistake until thay happen to glanse at it juost the write whey.
tim -- tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim Useful random insult:- He has a tenuous grip on the obvious.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Chris Muller -
Dan Norton -
David T. Lewis -
Stéphane Rollandin -
tim Rowledge