-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I was writing a tiny messanger similar to kxicq, mostly to fool around a bit with encryption. I dont have much time lately, so i was trying to keep the efforts small. My idea was to write a small java server and then access it from squeak to have the client squeaking. That sure would be a reasonable approach, but i got kinda pissed when xml-rpc for java didnt wanna work together with mycgiserver, and now id prefer to find a tiny solution to swap simple information with a public server for zero costs elsewhere in the net.
is anyone aware of such a possibility? (this isnt urgent; if there is none im gonna write my own xml-rpc or modify xml-rpc so that the packages work -- its just that im so tired of this approach..)
regards,
nick - -- Those who express random thoughts to legislative committees are often surprised and appalled to find themselves the instigators of law. -- Mark B. Cohen
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Niko Schwarz wrote:
I was writing a tiny messanger similar to kxicq, mostly to fool around a bit with encryption. I dont have much time lately, so i was trying to keep the efforts small. My idea was to write a small java server and then access it from squeak to have the client squeaking. That sure would be a reasonable approach, but i got kinda pissed when xml-rpc for java didnt wanna work together with mycgiserver, and now id prefer to find a tiny solution to swap simple information with a public server for zero costs elsewhere in the net.
is anyone aware of such a possibility? (this isnt urgent; if there is none im gonna write my own xml-rpc or modify xml-rpc so that the packages work -- its just that im so tired of this approach..)
Why not use a pubically available Jabber (http://www.jabber.org) server and write a Jabber client for Squeak? The protocol is Java based, and there already has been some work done toward a Jabber client in Squeak, implementing the low-level protocol at least.
http://swiki.gsug.org:8080/sqfixes/2460.html
Regards, Aaron
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Aaron J Reichow wrote:
Why not use a pubically available Jabber (http://www.jabber.org) server and write a Jabber client for Squeak? The protocol is Java based...
You mean XML based, of course; I know, sometimes it's hard to tell one overhyped technology from another...
;) Avi
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Avi Bryant wrote:
Why not use a pubically available Jabber (http://www.jabber.org) server and write a Jabber client for Squeak? The protocol is Java based...
You mean XML based, of course; I know, sometimes it's hard to tell one overhyped technology from another...
D'oh! I think you're right about that!
Regards, Aaron
Aaron Reichow :: UMD ACM Pres :: http://www.d.umn.edu/~reic0024/ "if i don't stay true to live and hate, how do i differentiate between chasing cream and chasing dreams" :: atmosphere
Aaron J Reichow wrote:
Why not use a pubically available Jabber (http://www.jabber.org) server and write a Jabber client for Squeak? The protocol is Java based, and there already has been some work done toward a Jabber client in Squeak, implementing the low-level protocol at least.
I love coincidences ;-) Just an hour ago dusted off the Jabber code that's lying around (one implementation by Exobox/Duane Maxwell, one by me) and see what I can get to work.
I'll keep you posted
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 6. September 2002 19:09 schrieb Aaron J Reichow:
Why not use a pubically available Jabber (http://www.jabber.org) server and write a Jabber client for Squeak? The protocol is Java based, and there already has been some work done toward a Jabber client in Squeak, implementing the low-level protocol at least.
Well, nice idea. Guess I'd have to update that a big bit. Would be great if Michael really looked after whatever he's got left -- thanks in advance =)
regards,
nick
- -- If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man. -- Mark Twain
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org