It should be 51Deprecated then? ;)
Best, Marcel
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-50Deprecated-eem-1-mcz-tp4852032p4852077.htm... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Marcel,
Could you explain? I saw 45Deprecated and 46Deprecated but I didn't see any 47Deprecated and so concluded that the tip deprecated is the same as the current version. But that was a guess. What's the proper rationale?
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
On Sep 26, 2015, at 4:44 AM, marcel.taeumel Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de wrote:
It should be 51Deprecated then? ;)
Best, Marcel
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-50Deprecated-eem-1-mcz-tp4852032p4852077.htm... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 26.09.2015, at 16:28, Eliot Miranda eliot.miranda@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Marcel,
Could you explain? I saw 45Deprecated and 46Deprecated but I didn't see any 47Deprecated and so concluded that the tip deprecated is the same as the current version. But that was a guess. What's the proper rationale?
46Deprecated is conceptually the same as 50Deprecated,
That is anything in those packages was deprecated with the release of 4.6/5.0.
Anything newly deprecated has to go to the next release, that is 5.1, so that it is deprecated from 5.1 on. (It cannot be from 5.0 on, because that is out already)
Best regards -Tobias
_,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
On Sep 26, 2015, at 4:44 AM, marcel.taeumel Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de wrote:
It should be 51Deprecated then? ;)
Best, Marcel
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-50Deprecated-eem-1-mcz-tp4852032p4852077.htm... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Exactly. :)
Best, Marcel
-- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/The-Trunk-50Deprecated-eem-1-mcz-tp4852032p4852270.htm... Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Eliot Miranda -
marcel.taeumel -
Tobias Pape