Ale,
is this comparable to the SLL's from Visual Smalltalk? Are you using VW 3.0 yet? We denied the "offer" to upgrade.
Reinier.
---------- From: Alejandro F. Reimondo alereimondo@sugarweb.com To: squeak@cs.uiuc.edu; 'usib6tfj@pol.ru' Subject: RE: Modularizing (Was: How to setup squeak as an NT service) Date: Sunday, March 22, 1998 11:00 PM
So I definitely see modular images as really necessary, but I still don't know how to implement them. If anyone has any hint...
Parcels in VisualWorks (new version, Siena) is a good implementation of building packages of classes, methods and objects in a file that can be bound to the image dynamically. They are fully implemented in Smalltalk and is a recommended reading.
Ale.
---------- Desde: Boris G. Chr. Shingarov[SMTP:usib6tfj@pol.ru] Enviado el: Domingo 22 de Marzo de 1998 00:56 Para: squeak@cs.uiuc.edu Asunto: Modularizing (Was: How to setup squeak as an NT service)
<<Archivo: ATT00000.txt>>
----------
Reinier,
Sorry for late response.
is this comparable to the SLL's from Visual Smalltalk? Are you using VW 3.0 yet? We denied the "offer" to upgrade.
I'm not familiar with either version of VS so I can't tell if the thing I want to do is similar to SLL's. I was 'born' in VisualAge. In VA 4.0 and newer, they have a similar concept of "image components" but I don't much like their design and would never suggest Squeak to do the same thing.
Boris
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Boris G. Chr. Shingarov -
Reinier van Loon