j
: Next unread message k
: Previous unread message j a
: Jump to all threads
j l
: Jump to MailingList overview
Pierre,
I'm not familiar with the ANSI Smalltalk standard, nor am I aware whether Squeak attempts to conform to it. But perhaps that's why Association uses the definition for = it inherits from LookupKey.
I checked several implementations and found the semantics for = wrt Association split as follows:
VS 3.0 and Squeak require that only the keys match, while VA and VW 3.0 require that the values match as well.
(I'm assuming that VA and VW follow the ANSI definition.)
BTW, did you get a response to whether Thinglab has been ported to VW? If so, I must have missed it.
John Clarke
Pierre wrote:
Why method = is not redefined properly in class Associations?
squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org