[squeak-dev] Re: Squeak 4.4 Question
Frank Shearar
frank.shearar at gmail.com
Thu Jan 17 17:11:31 UTC 2013
No, it's not an emergency. It means an ugly hack in my build pack. It is something I want fixed in 4.5 though.
frank
On 17 Jan 2013, at 15:26, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>
> On 17.01.2013, at 02:03, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 17 January 2013 00:22, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16.01.2013, at 15:39, Yanni Chiu <yanni at rogers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 16/01/13 6:05 PM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> And in case this hasn't been mentioned yet, the non-desctructive condense sources is this:
>>>>>
>>>>> Smalltalk appendChangesTo: 'test123.sources'
>>>>
>>>> So, should 4.4 be re-done, or does this get run from 4.5 onwards.
>>>
>>>
>>> That's up to the release manager (but I thought 4.4 was done).
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>>
>> 4.4 is done, but of course if bugs are found then they need fixing,
>> which means occasional releases. People using Squeak in anger should
>> be using 4.4, not 4.5, so I expect/hope that we'll get bug reports for
>> 4.4 from people _using_ Squeak, and bug reports for 4.5 from the core
>> devs.
>>
>> frank
>
> Yes, but the sources thing isn't really a bug needing an immediate fix, is it?
>
> - Bert -
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|