[squeak-dev] Re: About OmniBrowser support in Squeak 4.1 trunk

Levente Uzonyi leves at elte.hu
Fri Apr 23 20:47:08 UTC 2010


On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Andreas Raab wrote:

> On 4/23/2010 4:00 AM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Hannes Hirzel wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear all
>>> 
>>> Sean DeNigris found out that refactoring with OmniBrowser (OB) does
>>> not (yet) work in Squeak 4.1 trunk.
>>> 
>>> He loaded it following the instructions in the 'Extending the system'
>>> workspace (help menu).
>>> 
>>> Comments?
>> 
>> The versions of OB and Refactoring Engine loaded by that script are
>> developement snapshots, not releases. A "previous snapshot" worked well
>> with Squeak 4.1, but the OB/RE stuff got broken recently.
>
> Can you provide the "correct" package versions? I used your earlier outline 
> and it fetched the latest versions too :-)

I don't know which they were, but when I posted the installer script the 
"then latest versions" worked well together. So we should check out which 
versions were the latest at the time and create a script which loads 
those.


Levente

>
> Cheers,
>  - Andreas
>
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> Hannes
>>> 
>>> P.S. I'm sorry but currently though being interested of having OB in
>>> Squeak 4.1 I cannot follow up on this (too many other threads open)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 4/23/10, DeNigris Sean <sean at clipperadams.com> wrote:
>>>>> Go to 'Help menu' / 'Extending the system'
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>> "Omnibrowser"
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>> "Refactoring engine and OB integration"
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I followed the instructions and they now load okay, yay!
>>>> Except... the refactoring seems to be unusable, doh :(
>>>> 
>>>> My first two refactoring attempts:
>>>> * rename method - MessageNotUnderstood:
>>>> SystemDictionary>>hasSpecialSelector:ifTrueSetByte:
>>>> * extract method - clicking accept on the 'Changes: refactor source,
>>>> extract method' pop-up does nothing - change is not made and pop-up
>>>> stays
>>>> there.
>>>> 
>>>> Should I file bugs for these? If so, for the package, or Squeak? Are
>>>> these
>>>> packages even intended/supported to run in Squeak?
>>>> 
>>>> Squeak 4.2-10006
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Sean DeNigris
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>
>



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list