[squeak-dev] SM licence text update

Frank Shearar frank.shearar at angband.za.org
Thu Apr 22 14:59:37 UTC 2010

On 2010/04/22 16:34, Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
>> Yes, MIT is compulsory for 4.1.
> Well, for inclusion only, so I don't think it matters for the Prolog
> package.
> (I'm currently co-maintainer of Prolog, but since I did not write all of
> it I can't change the licence anyway)

Indeed, I meant only to address the association of SqueakL with 
image-inclusion, not to imply that the Prolog package should be MIT.


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list