Phil, last week I asked the smalltalk community (ESUG  etc), to stay claim and wait for Apple to think about it based on an email 
exchange I had with Steve Jobs. At the time I thought it prudent to wait a further decision or statement. 

Give that Wired publish Alan & my thoughts on the matter it's likely now time to consider what to do next.  
 
So this is NOT the fault of ESUG not being proactive, they were itching to do something.  

At the moment I believe they are collecting ideas how to approach the problem in a meaningful manner. 
Suggestions are welcome. 

 
On 2010-04-21, at 1:29 PM, Phil (list) wrote:

> I've been surprised that I haven't seen any statement from ESUG re: how these policies negatively impact the future prospects for Smalltalk on the iPhone/iPad and the investments they've made in the platform to date that Apple seems willing to wipe out.  Wouldn't now be a good time to try to get some visibility on the larger issue?
> 
> Phil

--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2445 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20100421/42f0d998/smime.bin