[squeak-dev] Re: 4.1.1 WTF?

Hannes Hirzel hannes.hirzel at gmail.com
Sat Apr 17 18:01:35 UTC 2010

I agree with Andreas, it's not a big deal. Whatever. My preference
'Let's keep it as it is'.


On 4/17/10, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 4/17/2010 7:45 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>>> "David" == David T Lewis<lewis at mail.msen.com>  writes:
>> David>  I think Smalltalkers must just have some kind of mental block when
>> David>  it comes to zero-based indexing:
>> David>  '4.1.0' asVersion ==>  Error: VersionNumbers cannot contain zero
>> David>  or negative numbers
>> Eww.  So that's why the files are misnamed?
> Ah, last minute issues :-) The files were named intentionally, under the
> assumption that there will be 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 releases. In which case I
> find it much preferable to have the *first* version be called 4.1.1 and
> the *second* version 4.1.2 and the *third* version 4.1.3 etc.
> Seemed pretty obvious to me :-) But before we start a bikeshed
> discussion around it, I'd be willing to change that if people really
> think it's such a big deal.
> Cheers,
>    - Andreas

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list