[squeak-dev] Re: 4.1 release candidate 3
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Mon Apr 12 01:19:47 UTC 2010
On 4/11/2010 6:05 PM, Josh Gargus wrote:
> It's pretty weird... it seems like there's a directory with the same name as the VM that contains the VM:
> Lumi-4:~ schwa$ cd /Users/schwa/Squeak/images/pristine/Squeak4.1.1-mac/Squeak\ 4.2.3beta1U.app
> Lumi-4:Squeak 4.2.3beta1U.app schwa$ ls
> Squeak 4.2.3beta1U.app __MACOSX
> If I look inside the inner Squeak 4.2.3beta1U.app, it looks like a normal OS X Squeak VM (eg: the actual executable is inside in "Contents/MacOS/Squeak VM Opt"). When I try to run the inner VM, it works fine.
> Not sure how this could have happened. Perhaps the unzipper created a directory with the same name and unzipped into that?
Ah, yes, of course. That would be it. The baseline makefile
unzip -o "$(MACVM).zip" -d "tmp/mac/$(MACVM)"
I suppose this just needs to be
unzip -o "$(MACVM).zip" -d "tmp/mac/"
> On Apr 11, 2010, at 3:55 PM, Lawson English wrote:
>> Andreas Raab wrote:
>>> On 4/11/2010 8:41 AM, Lawson English wrote:
>>>> Andreas Raab wrote:
>>>>> Folks -
>>>>> I just finished rc3 for the 4.1 release and unless I'm missing
>>>>> something this is probably "it". It feels solid, there are no pending
>>>>> issues and consequently I'd like everyone to treat this as if it is
>>>>> the release. Download it here:
>>>> A slight nit: In http://ftp.squeak.org/trunk/4.1rc3/mac/ , the VM
>>>> included in the Squeak4.1.1-mac.zip is damaged.
>>> Ouch. Damaged? In what form? The build process simply extracts the VM and puts it into the same directory. Is this a permission issue perhaps? (i.e., do I need some or all of the VM to be executable when I make the build?)
>> Haven't looked into it further. Just the icon is grey on my mac. Double clicking informs you its damaged. The same file sitting outside that zipped directory works just fine.
More information about the Squeak-dev