[squeak-dev] Last minute change: Object>>is:

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Wed Apr 7 19:07:45 UTC 2010

On 7 April 2010 19:38, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Folks -
> I've been thinking about this for a while now and it seems to me that
> there's little harm done if we implement Object>>is: to just return false at
> this point. This doesn't say anything about whether we should use it or how
> we should use it but it seems to me that it would be a useful compatibility
> method to have, just in case someone wants to use it in an external package.
> Any strong opposition to that change?
Not me :)

> Cheers,
>  - Andreas

Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list