[squeak-dev] Last minute change: Object>>is:
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Wed Apr 7 16:38:16 UTC 2010
Folks -
I've been thinking about this for a while now and it seems to me that
there's little harm done if we implement Object>>is: to just return
false at this point. This doesn't say anything about whether we should
use it or how we should use it but it seems to me that it would be a
useful compatibility method to have, just in case someone wants to use
it in an external package.
Any strong opposition to that change?
Cheers,
- Andreas
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|