On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, John McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote:
Must not hit enter... 

may or may not one has to find the actual code and maybe it is platform dependent etc etc. 

An attempt was made to ask the VM what the next wakeup time is. The VM actually knows this it's the bottom end of the Delay logic. 
We then sleep to this tick, using a call that should awake the process if an BSD interrupt (ill defined) arrives. 

In here we also service socket handles etc and oh maybe some other house keeping. 

Still the objective was to sleep until we have to wake up for Morphics 50 times a second poll, or some UI/socket/interrupt arrives. 

But the objective should be to sleep until theres' something to do:
- i/o is possible
- a delay has expired
- a callback from some other thread has occurred (if the VM is multi-threaded)
Otherwise it should block forever.

This "pause for a little while" is bogus.

In practice there are some artifacts like the Scheduler saying go to sleep but awake -2 milliseconds ago because of some race condition with in the Delay logic. (good luck finding that)... 

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 7:18 PM, John McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote:
Well let me reflect.
Nothing has changed, the VM energy sapping field is the same as  yesterday, just more evident. 

 I wasn't able to determine what code base is used, but if I go back 5 or 10 years.

(a) The morphic event polling cycle runs 50 times a second. One could write some timer consolidation code there to consider when do I have to wake up and paint all those morphs? No C/Objective-C/assembler/fortran required... 

(b) Maybe the VMs are event driven now and Morphic does not need to poll 50 times a second? 

(c) The BSD Unix socket system requires polling of some form.  But see work by Craig 10-15 back on "Flow"

(d) When all the Smalltalk Processes settle, the dispatcher runs the lowest priority task which calls relinquishProcessorForMicroseconds with a bogus value. 

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:21 PM, tim Rowledge <tim@rowledge.org> wrote:

Looking through some of the low-level changes in Mavericks I noticed stuff about timer consolidation. I *think* that it is something that you can offer to allow, rather than something done unto you code, but almost certainly it will have some sort of impact on the heartbeat ticker type of code used in stackvm/cog. Where is a skilled Mac vm maintainer when you need one?

tim Rowledge; tim@rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
"bOtHeR" said Pooh, mistaking the LSD tablet for aspirin

John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com>
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. Twitter: squeaker68882

John M. McIntosh <johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com>
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. Twitter: squeaker68882