On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Levente Uzonyi <leves@elte.hu> wrote:

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Hannes Hirzel wrote:

Yes, unzip.

You do not need to rename the file. croquet.exe. Just double click and
then it looks for the image file and launches it.

But I think you cannot go back to squeak.exe after you have started
and saved the image with croquet.exe. (Others please correct me)

Squeak images saved by the CogVM will have a new image format. The current release (4.1.1) of SqueakVM for windows can't read such images. I built a VM which can be used to convert your images back to the old formatl. It's available here: http://leves.web.elte.hu/squeak/SqueakVM-Win32-4.4.9-2358-non-official-bin.zip

Levente

--Hannes

On 4/29/11, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:

Do you mean extract cogwin.zip into the Squeak-All-In-One folder and then
rename croquet.exe to squeak.exe ?

Hannes Hirzel wrote:

To have Squeak with Cog I replaced the old Squeak VM with a Cog one
from http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/ (MSWindows)

--Hannes

On 4/29/11, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:

Hannes Hirzel wrote:

I agree. Does this imply that two all-in-one packages are needed, a
Cog and an non-cog?

--Hannes

On 4/28/11, Levente Uzonyi <leves@elte.hu> wrote:

Since this isn't the first time people do benchmarks, but don't
download
VMs independently, therefore I think we have to package VMs with the
releases in the future. IIRC someone even concluded that Pharo is
faster
than Squeak, but he just used what he got from the website (Cog for
Pharo
and the interpreter vm for Squeak).


Levente

Is the difference between a Cog and non-Cog VM just the a different exe
(for windows)?
How compatible are the images for Cog and non-Cog?
Could two executables be included in a single All-In-One package - ie
named like SqueakClassic.exe & SqueakCog.exe ?