Hi,<br>
<br>
shall I merge this fix or do you see any problems with the approach? :-)<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Christoph<br>
<br>
<font color="#808080">---<br>
</font><font color="#808080"><i>Sent from </i></font><font color="#808080"><i><a href="https://github.com/hpi-swa-lab/squeak-inbox-talk"><u><font color="#808080">Squeak Inbox Talk</font></u></a></i></font><br>
<br>
On 2020-02-08T15:57:27+01:00, leves@caesar.elte.hu wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, David T. Lewis wrote:<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Better to try it with flush rather than sync. On Windows, sqFileSync() just<br>
&gt; &gt; calls sqFileFlush(() anyway, and the flush does FlushFileBuffers().<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Right. It seems to be not possible to force changes to the physical disk <br>
&gt; on windows. And flush technically does the same as reopen on these <br>
&gt; platforms.<br>
&gt; So yes, flush is the better choice with an additional comment about the <br>
&gt; method not really forcing those files to the disk.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Levente<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Dave<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt;