>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Andreas Raab <
andreas.raab@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> Question: I've always wondered what this "isSelfEvaluating" stuff is good
>> for. There are thirteen implementors and a single user in Array>>printOn:.
>> Is there any *need* for Array>>printOn: to print a "self evaluating"
>> expression? Why not just Array(element1, element2, ....) just like any other
>> collection?
>>
>> We'd remove some 20 methods with no downside that I am aware of.
>
> Shouldn't the test be isLiteral instead of isSelfEvaluating? c.f. storeOn:
> storeOnStream:.
>