On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Gerardo Richarte
<gera@corest.com> wrote:
Eliot Miranda wrote:
> I wonder if anyone has any 32-bit processor implementations,
> either in Smalltalk or in some other, preferrably easy-to-parse,
> formal semantics.
I thought about this several times, but never came down to implement
it: The Intel manuals do have a very concrete pseudocode for every
instruction, and it does look quite parsable. I did start once, but the
need for it disappeared, and I never finished...
the description for ADD is:
DEST ← DEST + SRC + CF;
and for AAA (Ascii adjust after addition) is more complex:
IF 64-Bit Mode
THEN
#UD;
ELSE
IF ((AL AND 0FH) > 9) or (AF = 1)
THEN
AL ← AL + 6;
AH ← AH + 1;
AF ← 1;
CF ← 1;
AL ← AL AND 0FH;
ELSE
AF ← 0;
CF ← 0;
AL ← AL AND 0FH;
FI;
FI;
I think it really is an option to write a compiler from PDF to
Smalltalk :)
richie
Superficially this looks good. But it is only a part of the semantics. This is a fairly abstract semantics. It leaves out definitions of registers (e.g. DEST ← DEST + SRC + CF;) and all the instruction decode, which on x86 is complex and easy to screw up.